Thursday, January 31, 2008

If PSA of 3 can still indicate cancer, why is only a PSA > 4 suspicious?

...an anonymous reader asked.



A PSA level of 3 does not indicate cancer. 

Yet, it is possible to have a PSA of 3  with prostate cancer. 
 
PSA is a very successful screening test, and helped to detect and treat prostate cancer earlier. 
However, to make this screening test successful and efficient, thresholds had to be established.
Based on several very large studies these thresholds were set, because it was found, that with PSA levels below 4 the risk for prostate cancer is relatively low (see previous post Jan 28).
With PSA levels above 4 the risk was significantly higher.
These are statistical - empirical values. 
However, it is obvious,  that by setting a "threshold" (or cut-off) based on statistics (in contrast to personalized medicine), we always will have some patients who fall into the low risk group and do have cancer; and will find many patients with "elevated PSA" who have no cancer.

3 comments:

David said...

Greetings,

T1c prostate cancer is diagnosed because of an abnormal PSA in the setting of no palpable abnormality on Digital Rectal Examination and the cancer tumor is found in one or both lobes by needle biopsy.

In population screened situations, where a raised PSA is reported, a common clinical staging, utilizing the TNM classification, is T1c, which is “tumor identified by needle biopsy”.

However, when prostate cancer is found prior to biopsy, through the application of newer imaging techniques of the prostate, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, and that prostate cancer is confirmed by subsequent biopsy, would the clinical staging, prior to treatment, still remain T1, or could the clinical stage be up-graded to reflect a T2 or even T3 classification depending on the imaging results?

In other words, given that "magnetic imaging is now widely used for staging before treatment and accumulating data indicate the utility of this technique with magnetic resonance spectroscopy in staging and follow-up" , ( Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Oehr P, Bouchelouche K, Curr Opin Oncol. 2007 May;19(3):259-64) can the staging system reflect this improved imaging so as to better delineate T1 from T2 and T3 classification?

Thank you for your expertise,

David

Anonymous said...

I just want to tell yöü about how my mums life was saved from breast cancer,
The lumps had already taken over her breast,chimo was costing us too much,we
Lost all hope until I saw a testimony about a tradomedical doctor on yahooanswers,
We contacted him,he told us what to do,he sent us his pills and cream which we used,
We went back to the clinic after 3weeks,the doctor noticed that the lumps have reduced,
Then later they vanished...thanks to drmakindetradomedical at hotmail com.don't give up
Hope......yet

Jhon mac said...

Thanks for shearing about this I thinks its very hopeful post and very important post for us. Thanks for your great and helpful presentation I like your good service.I always appreciate your post.
prevent suicide